G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 4   V1s1t3d by: 208 users
24.11.2012 - 15:46
 VRIL
I suggest collateral damage is only applied if the defending units get defeated.
Otherwise the defending player suffers from it even if he did everything correctly.
This doesnt feel right for me. It also messes with the balance. Strats that rely on
units without collateral damage or focus on defending are noticeably weaker now.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
24.11.2012 - 19:57
 KYBL
People die in Gaza and Ashkelon but the cities are not captured
----

L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
24.11.2012 - 22:28
 Utah
The point is like a siege. Render the city useless then take it.
----
The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
25.11.2012 - 05:14
Wr1tt3n by Utah, 24.11.2012 at 22:28

The point is like a siege. Render the city useless then take it.

Render the city useless? I have had a city reduced to 1% of population (minimum) and yet it had 120%+ of income...
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2025 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd