• 1
  • 2
G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 36   V1s1t3d by: 74 users

0r1g1n4l p0st

P0st3d by DeepFriedUnicorn, 14.08.2019 - 16:36
I chat with a few, and when myself and others provide how inflation, economical structure and history work, they just disagree and that's it....Why are they difficult?

Do they lack knowledge in history and economics?
Or are they down a rabbit hole due to social media?
Or it is something else?

P0ll

Why are they difficult to deal with in a debate?

They lack knowledge in history/economics
19
They are simply, down a rabbit hole.
11

T0t4l v0t3s: 30
25.08.2019 - 17:56
Wr1tt3n by Skanderbeg, 25.08.2019 at 16:21

Wr1tt3n by Tribune Aquila, 25.08.2019 at 15:41

I have no idea what kind of response you just gave me, you didn't mention a thing I said. I was hoping you would just kind of roll into a ball and cry, but instead you are in denial. Your entire schtick is that communism is the way to go, right? USA is more socialist today than it's ever been, and you're bragging about the consequences these socialist reforms have created.


It's because your IQ is not high enough to understand. Blame your parents for (bad) upringing and 15 years(wasted) of education. Nothing we can help you with.


Look, Andartes. I know you don't have your friend, Tik-Tok, with you at your defense, but you're gonna have to either adopt an entirely new worldview, or refute my points. If you don't do either of those, then I think it's best you leave this bastion of intellectual thought. You aren't welcome here.
----
Happiness = reality - expectations
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
25.08.2019 - 18:15
Wr1tt3n by Tribune Aquila, 25.08.2019 at 17:56

Look, Andartes. I know you don't have your friend, Tik-Tok, with you at your defense, but you're gonna have to either adopt an entirely new worldview, or refute my points. If you don't do either of those, then I think it's best you leave this bastion of intellectual thought. You aren't welcome here.


Bastion of intellectual thought? Hahaha. All your arguments are invalidated after you used ad hominem, nothing else to continue after this. Debate is won.

I win, you lose.
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
25.08.2019 - 18:29
Wr1tt3n by DeepFriedUnicorn, 25.08.2019 at 16:57

China is more so a Capitalist Economy Communist Government hybrid...A strange nation indeed.


Could be said, but incorrect when you switch to their point of view.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Economic_Policy

Communism is invented as replacement ideology for Capitalism, its inventor is German. He made it for the Western World, not Eastern, since East didn't develop Capitalism yet. Yet Communism went East for some reason so its leaders had to address the economic dichotomy.

They invented NEP, to let Capitalism develop, and then take over the economy. Compromise was found by seizing economic sectors of national interest, like banks(finance) ports(trade), rails(transportation) and mines(resources), but leaving farms and factories to people to manage (entrepreneurs, businessman, peasants, workers etc).

Deng Xiapoing, Chinese reformer said him self that NEP is perhaps the best model of Socialism (link above). So for them, the economy is still Socialist, not Capitalist, as not everything is free, it is heavily regulated and requires State approval (30% of Chinese economy is State-owned and Finance is State-owned completey via People's Banks, leaving only Hong Kong and Shanghai stocks to speculate and gamble with their own money).

Maybe this is why they are so succesful? State(Government) controlled economy in the era of financial instability and volatile market. Their growth is unprecedented and living standards skyrocketed high. Now when experts and analysts compare it to India, they can't claim Democracy is guarantor of high living standard and wealth. Both China and India have large populations, one is Communist, the other is Democracy, yet Democratic India lags behind China in terms of economy, military and social order.

Fun fact: China doesn't calculate economic size like USA, using all finance turned over in one year, but only 'real' production and its value. Which mean, China's economy could already be larger than US one, in GDP nominal terms (by GDP PPP it is already bigger).
----
If a game is around long enough, people will find the most efficient way to play it and start playing it like robots
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
26.08.2019 - 23:30
Wr1tt3n by Tribune Aquila, 24.08.2019 at 22:10



Did you do your undergrad or masters in Economics? I liked your detailed backing of points via real research; your post was well-supported and better than mine

I don't think the high GDP per Capita of cities can be fully explained by social programs, as cities tend to have positive conglomeration effects and a high prevalence of productive professional jobs etc as compared to more rural areas, but I guess social programs might indeed be a factor, even if minor. I never thought of that before, good point.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
27.08.2019 - 02:27
Soldier001
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Capitalism is rape, communism is consensual sex
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
27.08.2019 - 03:24
Capitalism sucks however still the best so far
Same goes to Democracy
----
Do you fear death? Do you fear that dark abyss? All your deeds laid bare. All your sins punished.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
  • 1
  • 2
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd