G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 16   V1s1t3d by: 652 users
06.10.2012 - 08:45
I just started playing, and I generally like to start out as S. Korea. I have been using NC as my strat; it really helps expanding out on the first turn, capping N.K., Japan, and China South East in the first turn. However, after the first three turns, it seems to lose some steam, and I generally don't fare well in the land battles. Should I purchase imperialist and start using that, or is there a better strat for S. Korea? Any help would be appreciated.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
06.10.2012 - 09:41
Imperialist is more of a strat for poor countries. Try Sky Menace with South Korea.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
06.10.2012 - 10:12
AlexMeza
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Imperialist is really good but I didn't try it in world games yet. Try Master of Stealth Germany it's amazing.Or UK MoS.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
06.10.2012 - 13:20
MoS Germany=ownage
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
06.10.2012 - 13:34
Imperialist is a good choice for South Korea. So is Sky Menace and guerrilla warfare, but I recommend imperialist for your rank it's cheap and easy.

Here are some stats for attacking neutral countries using imperialist.

- 6 tanks beats 8 militia
- 13 infantry beats 8 militia
.....................................

- 1 tanks and 1 infantry beats 1 militia
- 2 tanks beats 2 militia
- 3 tanks beats 3 militia
- 4 tanks beats 4 militia
- 4 tanks beats 5 militia
- 5 tanks beats 6 militia
- 5 or 6 tanks beats 7 militia
.....................................

- 2 or 3 infantry beats 1 militia
- 4 infantry beats 2 militia
- 5 infantry beats 3 militia
- 7 infantry beats 4 militia
- 9 infantry beats 5 militia
- 10 infantry beats 6 militia
- 11 infantry beats 7 militia
....................................

With imperialist South Korea you should easily be able to get China North, China Northeast and North Korea week 1. Try to practice that expansion in-game and substitute the cities and countries you attack to improve it. You can also get Japan with 8 infantry and 7 tanks in a sea transport.
----
Don't trust the manipulative rabbit.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
07.10.2012 - 04:52
Wr1tt3n by learster, 06.10.2012 at 09:41

Imperialist is more of a strat for poor countries. Try Sky Menace with South Korea.


not really, try getting all of europe with imperialist, then spam 100's of bombers at asia, you will always have tons and tons of money, auto producing bombers in the entire of the middle east as well as the balkands will out-spam asia SM for sure.

also i would prefer IMP korea over SM korea, IMP has much less upkeep for militia and also your bombers so you can end up spamming more bombers, and if you can hold india lol gg.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
08.10.2012 - 09:41
Wr1tt3n by nonames, 07.10.2012 at 04:52

Wr1tt3n by learster, 06.10.2012 at 09:41

Imperialist is more of a strat for poor countries. Try Sky Menace with South Korea.


not really, try getting all of europe with imperialist, then spam 100's of bombers at asia, you will always have tons and tons of money, auto producing bombers in the entire of the middle east as well as the balkands will out-spam asia SM for sure.

also i would prefer IMP korea over SM korea, IMP has much less upkeep for militia and also your bombers so you can end up spamming more bombers, and if you can hold india lol gg.


How do I auto produce units, and is it a good idea to keep it on? Seems like it might mess up income.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
08.10.2012 - 09:47
I have been taking N. Korea, Japan, and China SE on the first turn, should I be going for N. Korea, China North and China NE on the first turn instead? Generally the three I go for are all wide open on turn one, so I go for them. It seems like the northern territories will be open longer than the southern in most games. If I take S. Korea, people usually start around Thialand or Tiawan. It seems rare to have someone else start in Northern areas, all though it does happen from time to time.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
08.10.2012 - 18:24
Wr1tt3n by IRuleAll77, 08.10.2012 at 09:47

I have been taking N. Korea, Japan, and China SE on the first turn, should I be going for N. Korea, China North and China NE on the first turn instead? Generally the three I go for are all wide open on turn one, so I go for them. It seems like the northern territories will be open longer than the southern in most games. If I take S. Korea, people usually start around Thialand or Tiawan. It seems rare to have someone else start in Northern areas, all though it does happen from time to time.


Getting Japan is a good income booster, however I would get China North instead of China Southeast.
----
Don't trust the manipulative rabbit.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
12.10.2012 - 01:59
Wr1tt3n by tophat, 08.10.2012 at 18:24

Wr1tt3n by IRuleAll77, 08.10.2012 at 09:47

I have been taking N. Korea, Japan, and China SE on the first turn, should I be going for N. Korea, China North and China NE on the first turn instead? Generally the three I go for are all wide open on turn one, so I go for them. It seems like the northern territories will be open longer than the southern in most games. If I take S. Korea, people usually start around Thialand or Tiawan. It seems rare to have someone else start in Northern areas, all though it does happen from time to time.


Getting Japan is a good income booster, however I would get China North instead of China Southeast.


tophats is genius
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
13.12.2012 - 00:05
Wr1tt3n by nonames, 07.10.2012 at 04:52

Wr1tt3n by learster, 06.10.2012 at 09:41

Imperialist is more of a strat for poor countries. Try Sky Menace with South Korea.


not really, try getting all of europe with imperialist, then spam 100's of bombers at asia, you will always have tons and tons of money, auto producing bombers in the entire of the middle east as well as the balkands will out-spam asia SM for sure.

also i would prefer IMP korea over SM korea, IMP has much less upkeep for militia and also your bombers so you can end up spamming more bombers, and if you can hold india lol gg.


Not really. an SM bomber has -30 cost anyways, so a bomber made with SM costs as much as a bomber made with Imp. Also the imp. gives a negative bonus to bomber attack, and SM gives a +2 bonus, which leads to two armies of bombers, one at 5 attack and one at 8, that cost the same. You must also take into account the fact that the air units also move faster, and that the air transports are MUCH cheaper under the SM strategy than compared to IMP. Granted, you'll have more income due to the home countries' militia/infantry not costing as much, but as far as auto-producing bombers are concerned, SM beats Imp. any day.
----
"Bitches ain't shit, but hoes and tricks"
-Mahatma Gandhi
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.01.2016 - 13:49
Qu0t3:
Imperialist is more of a strat for poor countries. Try Sky Menace with South Korea.


Imperialist is best with very poor countries like africa. next time i play ill screenshot my success!
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.01.2016 - 18:03
Wr1tt3n by Rickieboss, 18.01.2016 at 13:49

Imperialist is best with very poor countries like africa. next time i play ill screenshot my success!

Bro, pls look at the date of the post before commenting
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
20.01.2016 - 15:52
Ohh....
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
29.01.2016 - 08:22
Wow nice
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
24.02.2016 - 04:15
This post is old enough. The mods should probably lock it.
----


L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd