27.09.2014 - 09:58
Its an error in this game, yeah you know what im talking about: the cw system! clans with low competence getting 1st place since they are able to win few games vs clans with higher competence. *Mine proposal (first idea to start this topic) -Every season their are 50 cw's you can play for points. -Each victory/win will bring you points or let you lose points -Their wont be wins anymore that give you 100 cp anymore -The basic win/lose cp you recieve or lose stays 50, the max you can win/lose could be around 75 nothing more. -After your 50 cw's the system will save your clan's points and you wont be able to manipulate this by playing more games. -Yes ofc, your able to cw after reaching 50, but it wont influence your points, but it will influence your clan's competence rating. DONT FLAME WAR this topic rather PM me with your ideas and il make sure they will get mentioned in this topic! Sheers!
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 10:02
Yea time to push for some change on this issue, even a small change of making it +50 points per win regardless of comp would suffice for the timebeing, this bs has been going on too long.
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 10:05
Duno I am mixed. It would good to know how cp after win is calculated. Yes I think it should be same regardless of the position or comp of the clans. But this would hardly improve anything on its own. We need to have 50 cws to have a fair system for each season. And the calculation for top clans should be based on the performance of that clan for that season taking into account number of games played, won and lost.
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 10:09
i mentioned it already, i said, 50cw's each season
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 10:28
Or cap the season at 20 games.. So nothing else counts. You will gain cp but won't touch the 20 main cws. But still need to resolve cp calculations
---- It's not the end.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 10:29
Couldn't have said it any better.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:16
Charge the currently CW system has been suggested long ago. But oh well, another threat asking the same wont hurt
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:27
Consistently said competence is a problem, it should be there as a reference point, but shouldn't in anyway influence scoring.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:41
My right what?
---- Laochra¹: i pray to the great zizou, that my tb stops the airtrans of the yellow infidel
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:54
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:55
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 12:56
support
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 17:13
I agree. I've been after this for a long time. See: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=9657 I definitely agree that 50 CW's is an admirable aim. However, I don't believe any sort of cap will help. We don't want people to cw for 45 days then just stop cwing for the rest of the season.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
27.09.2014 - 19:22
Ik that their are other posts about this, i just felt that the time had come to wake everything up again
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
|
30.09.2014 - 12:28
Touching on what Desu said about a cap: A solution to clans stopping CWing to preserve score or whatever would be to set a requirement. So in addition to 50 CWs being the cap (though I see that as rediculous) it would also be the requirement. Anything under 50, in this case, means you aren't actually in the running for season rank. I say that 25 is more manageable. But yes, setting a cap and that the cap is the requirement in order to officially be ranked for the season are a good solution. Clans that don't CW the full 25 (in my example) would not be able to take any rank for the season. Also, on the note of comp: Competence shouldn't determine anything in the season rankings. Only win/loss should be made a relevant fixation for the CW season.
---- "Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one"
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
|
4r3 y0u sur3?