G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 4   V1s1t3d by: 40 users
20.02.2013 - 19:45
 Ouch
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
22.02.2013 - 15:15
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
22.02.2013 - 15:45
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
23.02.2013 - 06:33
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd