G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 2   V1s1t3d by: 54 users
18.10.2012 - 08:09
So a few of us were talking on Global last night saying that naval units should be able to carry air units. At first, I stated that this was a silly idea, since aircraft don't need to be carried. first it was pointed out to me that the transports could be given a larger movement speed than the aircraft, which would make a legitimate reason to use them. Also as we later got into a discussion about a nuclear war map, somebody pointed out that there could be nukes that could be put onto submarines specifically made to carry nukes, which would be able to be able to get closer to the target without the missile being seen, and then launch them so close to the enemy that they have no time to react.
----
"Bitches ain't shit, but hoes and tricks"
-Mahatma Gandhi
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.10.2012 - 08:10
Credit to myself, Tunder, Cpt. Magic, and I think one other person (sorry I can't remember who it was)
----
"Bitches ain't shit, but hoes and tricks"
-Mahatma Gandhi
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd