OFFICIAL: Suggest small changes in the game

Wr1tt3n by Tirpitz406, 28.05.2014 at 17:52

Wr1tt3n by Mr_Own_U, 28.05.2014 at 17:27

50 comp for each clan win.

And check your moderator list and logs to see which mod(s) have to go!

what if 2 clans have 20 wins if this game keeps growing?

The clan with the higher comp % wins

Not really sure how easy this'd be, but please add more starting cash options, in intervals of 1000 or even 500 if you feel like it. There'd be a lot of new possibilities for normal atWar, but it'd be even better for custom maps like Ancient World.

(Also, I completely agree with TopHat's suggestion #2 down there. The randomness of neutral reinfs can really screw things up for one player or team. You know that feeling when you're Turkey, and first turn Bucharest has 7, Sofia has 5, Athens has 9, stuff like that?

I don't know how difficult the following is to implement. But here it goes.

1) remove units when an enemy dies. (they become neutral units) gets really annoying.
2) The game's neutral unit generator for cities is pretty random, it can often make it unfair for a player at times. (for example: Paris has 8 neutral infantry normally, but sometimes it changes to 9 first turn. This can affect one's expansion. It can also cost battles too. We have to attack those cities with a little more power just in case it does change.) I suggest that neutral cities should be reinforced with 1 unit on the reinforcement turn, just like player cities. So that players can preempt it and this would also make it equal for everyone.

3) Add different sounds effects for each unit in the battle phase. (I know most just skip the battles, but this could add a "cool" element to the game. For example, a bomber attacking would sound like a bomber dropping bombs, tanks would sound like tanks, helicopters (propellers) etc..

Thanks for the thread!!

Allow team chat while picking countries in team games!

Make it possible to chat with the allies while picking countries

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 28.05.2014 at 23:56

1) remove units when an enemy dies. (they become neutral units) gets really annoying.

No...

Wr1tt3n by Unleasheds Wrath, 29.05.2014 at 04:24

Make it possible to chat with the allies while picking countries

+

Wr1tt3n by Safari, 28.05.2014 at 04:53

Let us select our favorite color in our profile.
Here is a good Js code for that, where you can choose colors from predefined colors (so that noone abuses it ) http://andreaslagerkvist.com/jquery/colour-picker/#jquery-plugin-example or http://www.laktek.com/2008/10/27/really-simple-color-picker-in-jquery/

In game it automatically takes that color and if the users favorite color is already taken, then it will be like now, that the user gets the first available color.

+

Wr1tt3n by Pinheiro, 28.05.2014 at 07:27

This is a very small one I guess: reduce the movement range nerf on Iron Fist strategy from -3 to -2 just like every other unit (see status). This change was firstly made to balance the strategy, but after that it also got a hp nerf.

-

Wr1tt3n by Eagle, 28.05.2014 at 04:32

Http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=13806
I would only like this to be fixed, if all other of mine units are tb ed, that gen doesnt attack by himself, but to stay in that stack

+

Wr1tt3n by Lemonade, 28.05.2014 at 11:54

A reset of all competencies after every season would fix this problem

-

Wr1tt3n by Nero, 28.05.2014 at 16:41

More players per game. World games with 20+ players <3
Goes well with more colors

+

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 28.05.2014 at 23:56

I don't know how difficult the following is to implement. But here it goes.

1) remove units when an enemy dies. (they become neutral units) gets really annoying.
2) The game's neutral unit generator for cities is pretty random, it can often make it unfair for a player at times. (for example: Paris has 8 neutral infantry normally, but sometimes it changes to 9 first turn. This can affect one's expansion. It can also cost battles too. We have to attack those cities with a little more power just in case it does change.) I suggest that neutral cities should be reinforced with 1 unit on the reinforcement turn, just like player cities. So that players can preempt it and this would also make it equal for everyone.

3) Add different sounds effects for each unit in the battle phase. (I know most just skip the battles, but this could add a "cool" element to the game. For example, a bomber attacking would sound like a bomber dropping bombs, tanks would sound like tanks, helicopters (propellers) etc..

Thanks for the thread!!

dont implement suggestion 1, in teamgames a player who dies can influence a game by stacking important countries to slow the victor down. this is a great strategical feature. points 2 and 3 tho are cool

Tops meant the units that are outside cities

Wr1tt3n by Tunder4, 28.05.2014 at 09:04

Allows us to give negative range to units in custom maps. That way we can have real unmovable units. (Currently one has to make them naval units with 0 range, in order to stop blitz players from moving them).

Wr1tt3n by Tunder4, 28.05.2014 at 08:30

When you create a new city in the custom map, Make it have "1" for income by default.

We need sound when someone pr you. so o ppl can be on the forums or doing something else and know when sameone is talking to them on the game

Wr1tt3n by Permamuted, 29.05.2014 at 06:35

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 28.05.2014 at 23:56

I don't know how difficult the following is to implement. But here it goes.

1) remove units when an enemy dies. (they become neutral units) gets really annoying.
2) The game's neutral unit generator for cities is pretty random, it can often make it unfair for a player at times. (for example: Paris has 8 neutral infantry normally, but sometimes it changes to 9 first turn. This can affect one's expansion. It can also cost battles too. We have to attack those cities with a little more power just in case it does change.) I suggest that neutral cities should be reinforced with 1 unit on the reinforcement turn, just like player cities. So that players can preempt it and this would also make it equal for everyone.

3) Add different sounds effects for each unit in the battle phase. (I know most just skip the battles, but this could add a "cool" element to the game. For example, a bomber attacking would sound like a bomber dropping bombs, tanks would sound like tanks, helicopters (propellers) etc..

Thanks for the thread!!

dont implement suggestion 1, in teamgames a player who dies can influence a game by stacking important countries to slow the victor down. this is a great strategical feature. points 2 and 3 tho are cool

I mean units outside cities.

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 28.05.2014 at 23:56

2) The game's neutral unit generator for cities is pretty random, it can often make it unfair for a player at times. (for example: Paris has 8 neutral infantry normally, but sometimes it changes to 9 first turn. This can affect one's expansion. It can also cost battles too. We have to attack those cities with a little more power just in case it does change.) I suggest that neutral cities should be reinforced with 1 unit on the reinforcement turn, just like player cities. So that players can preempt it and this would also make it equal for everyone.

I don't like this idea that much. I kind of like the randomness of the current system. Kind of forces you to play slightly different each time and keeps you on your toes so you aren't just a robot going through the motions.

Wr1tt3n by Spart, 29.05.2014 at 10:36

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 28.05.2014 at 23:56

2) The game's neutral unit generator for cities is pretty random, it can often make it unfair for a player at times. (for example: Paris has 8 neutral infantry normally, but sometimes it changes to 9 first turn. This can affect one's expansion. It can also cost battles too. We have to attack those cities with a little more power just in case it does change.) I suggest that neutral cities should be reinforced with 1 unit on the reinforcement turn, just like player cities. So that players can preempt it and this would also make it equal for everyone.

I don't like this idea that much. I kind of like the randomness of the current system. Kind of forces you to play slightly different each time and keeps you on your toes so you aren't just a robot going through the motions.

1) It's unfair.
2) It currently does not add much strategy to the game. (the level of improvisation is very insignificant)
3) The fact that it would reinforce every reinforcement turn would add an improvisation factor and eliminate, the "going through the motions" I think.

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 29.05.2014 at 10:51

1) It's unfair.
2) It currently does not add much strategy to the game. (the level of improvisation is very insignificant)
3) The fact that it would reinforce every reinforcement turn would add an improvisation factor and eliminate, the "going through the motions" I think.

What do you mean by 'improvisation is very insignificant' If you are Turkey and Romania gets a bonus neutral unit added and you end up not taking it, You obviously have to improvise to not only take Romania, but also change up your moves since you cannot use Romania reinforcements to do what you would normally do with it.

Wr1tt3n by Fockmeeard, 29.05.2014 at 10:59

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 29.05.2014 at 10:51

1) It's unfair.
2) It currently does not add much strategy to the game. (the level of improvisation is very insignificant)
3) The fact that it would reinforce every reinforcement turn would add an improvisation factor and eliminate, the "going through the motions" I think.

What do you mean by 'improvisation is very insignificant' If you are Turkey and Romania gets a bonus neutral unit added and you end up not taking it, You obviously have to improvise to not only take Romania, but also change up your moves since you cannot use Romania reinforcements to do what you would normally do with it.

Literally 100% of the time that romania has 7 militia or 8 even, i will attack it. -.-

Wr1tt3n by tophat, 29.05.2014 at 10:51

1) It's unfair.
2) It currently does not add much strategy to the game. (the level of improvisation is very insignificant)
3) The fact that it would reinforce every reinforcement turn would add an improvisation factor and eliminate, the "going through the motions" I think.

1) Unfair on a per-match basis perhaps, but the law of averages comes into play overall here and it balances out when you look at a large group of matches.

2) (Insert Fock Argument Here)

3) I don't see how that would occur. For the first week maybe? But it will take no time for the vast majority of players to have the pattern of additional 1 unit per rein week down and everyone's play will adapt to that change permanently. It won't do anything to prevent a "going through the motions" play-style in the big picture.

Make chat tabbed like most online games not a drop down multi select menu. Your chats would remain that way to a greater extent.

Make custom maps/scenarios playable to rank 5s and above only. and maybe premium players

Pros:
- Encourages new players to play more to reach the level where they get to try out the flashy custom maps
- Forces new players to learn basic aw skills and use of strats on the default map where these things matter.
- Prevents the issue this 9 day old rank 5 player has seen which the rest of us have realised as a problem for a long time. http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=13927
- encourages premium purchases so more profit.

Cons:
-

The possibility of ending the game as "Draw" in team fight games plz!! like huge games that we dont have time to play them for ex asia vs USA , and so on plz add this option :3

Wr1tt3n by Skanderbeg, 28.05.2014 at 15:50

2) Checked moderators (no trolls or nazis)

and of course not a communist mods , what the hell does it affect you him being nazi , he is free to choice whatever he likes -_-

Wr1tt3n by YazanTheSexy, 29.05.2014 at 15:06

Wr1tt3n by Skanderbeg, 28.05.2014 at 15:50

2) Checked moderators (no trolls or nazis)

and of course not a communist mods , what the hell does it affect you him being nazi , he is free to choice whatever he likes -_-

Bias based on race probably. I have no problem with a national socialist being a mod as long as he is not an open racist

I have a suggestion. This was in a thread I made earlier but ill just post it now. Update Maps so a Map Maker can select a group of units and place them I a group of countries. So we don't have to spend hours putting units in each country.

Wr1tt3n by Quantum027, 29.05.2014 at 16:24

I have a suggestion. This was in a thread I made earlier but ill just post it now. Update Maps so a Map Maker can select a group of units and place them I a group of countries. So we don't have to spend hours putting units in each country.

I suggested this a few months ago but didn't get much attention. Support!

Wr1tt3n by Goblin, 29.05.2014 at 04:25

What tophats said ...does funny moments when you pick germany in 1v1 and norway has 5, sweden has 5, austria has 7, croatia 3 and czech 5 ....true story -__-

last time in my game it was 8 in austria 5 in sweden 5 in norway 4 in denmark and 4 in czech 3 in NL 3 in swiss it ruined my expansion -_-

I think u guys should fix color options...color options should be more available I LOVE BLACK COLOR BT I CANT PICK IT IN 3v3 -_- cmon! i pray make it scroll system

I don't know if it is hard to fix but the chatbox is refreshed all the time and I lose my private messages. there might be tabs for personal messaging maybe.

Fix hybrid warfare - i suggest just removing the inf nerf cost and see how we go from there, [ inf to expensive and that cause no one want to play as buying inf will hurt your economy, but it your main defense also ]

while community might not be fully on board, i go for +1 mov on IF for militia [ i would like to be able to wall with militia cheaply ]

and if possible kill the regent or general game option for elimination

Wr1tt3n by Cthulhu, 29.05.2014 at 19:55

Fix hybrid warfare - i suggest just removing the inf nerf cost and see how we go from there, [ inf to expensive and that cause no one want to play as buying inf will hurt your economy, but it your main defense also ]

while community might not be fully on board, i go for +1 mov on IF for militia [ i would like to be able to wall with militia cheaply ]

and if possible kill the regent or general game option for elimination

My little pony: Friendship is magic. Support for Hw an IF changes

Wr1tt3n by KYBL, 29.05.2014 at 17:30

Wr1tt3n by Quantum027, 29.05.2014 at 16:24

I have a suggestion. This was in a thread I made earlier but ill just post it now. Update Maps so a Map Maker can select a group of units and place them I a group of countries. So we don't have to spend hours putting units in each country.

I suggested this a few months ago but didn't get much attention. Support!

I did the same lol at least now Ivan and Amok are looking for it.