G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 6   V1s1t3d by: 30 users
28.05.2014 - 04:28
What is less difficult?
To invade from USA to Europe or invade to USA from Europe?

I would like to hear your opinions and explanations.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
28.05.2014 - 05:02
 Htin
Hard question. Europe>North america. But If it was FFA (asia) can pressure europe.If asia still in war, europe has a chance, to take north america. BUt if a united asia extended from japan to at least India. North AMerica will a great starting place.
----
Hi
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
28.05.2014 - 06:43
Europe is stronger.You may not believe it but:

1.Better income
2.More units.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
28.05.2014 - 10:02
USA is much easier to invade. The USA consists of only 8 territories, you can stop all USA reinforcements by taking 8 cities. While Europe consists of 7 large countries, and many smaller countries, making it much harder to invade.
----
"Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler

L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
28.05.2014 - 10:57
Stronghold europe.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
28.05.2014 - 11:28
Europe is easier to invade, since it's way harder to defend when your reinforcements are split in many capitals. Now, if we are talking about fully conquest of the continent, I have no doubt it would be harder to control europe, as the player holding it can recover faster from an attack.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd