G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 15   V1s1t3d by: 73 users

P0ll

Many "Rogue" inside "Role Players Map". We need this option game!

Yeah, it's very important option for RP
19
Yes, it's good to have it for any game
9
No, it's useless (really?)
18

T0t4l v0t3s: 45
18.05.2016 - 18:21
Thank you to let your opinion also
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.05.2016 - 18:28
WE need an option for sure !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.05.2016 - 18:38
Yes I think so. i'm tired to repeat everytimes same things to players to dont attack (until turn 4) for RP ....
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.05.2016 - 18:54
I have no idea what this is about but my vote still counts!!!
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.05.2016 - 18:59
Lollz turn 2 for all games it shud be
DELETE RP
----
USA USA USA
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 04:41
Usually we can attack turn 2 any players, it's why we can still have option to use turn 2 for others maps and not rp. It's why I say turn 2 (for normal game) and more turn for RP and MapMakers. MapMakers make many efforts to have new maps to enjoy our community but it's could be ruined the game if players rogue and don't respect the rules of the map. It happening often...
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 04:46
njab
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 04:46
Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 04:51
Wr1tt3n by Guest, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

I don't see "Rimuv RP" option here. Shit poll.


Njab, this poll is for RP players and mapmakers.
If you dont want play RP, just ignore this poll ;-)
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 04:52
Wr1tt3n by your_PROUD, 19.05.2016 at 04:46

Yes Rogues just destroy the Environemt of RP


Exactly and can destroy also the pleasure to play a good RP map.
----
열흘 붉은 꽃이 없다 !
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 08:09
Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 08:51
The 'Yes' option is going to win, because of the sheer number of RP fa- players on this game.

Voted 'No', although this poll really needs a 'Hell Naw!' option.

Wr1tt3n by RaulPB, 19.05.2016 at 08:09

Em..... it certainly is not a priority but you could have it as an option for map makers.

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'
----


L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 08:59
Lol NO NO NO
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.05.2016 - 09:22
Wr1tt3n by Darth., 19.05.2016 at 08:51

Having it as an option for custom map-makers, is AW speak for: 'Its useless, and a lot of people don't want it, but we're too fed-up to argue about it, so let's compromise'

Well.... kinda...

I simply don't want to argue about this which has already been sugggested before. If you say yes, you're admitting it's useful, which it doesn't really is; and if you say no, RP fa - players will think you're a RP hater and a bad person because there's no reason whatsoever for not having such feature as an option since it would not harm us in any way directly, which also is a bit untrue since that would enable lots of narb map makers to make "no war maps"...
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
20.05.2016 - 12:25
Only way I see this being useful would be so Russia and Japan don't attack each other right away in ww2
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd