Clan War - Sp Multiplyer

With the new SP multiplier in place to prevent farming, it is surely time to go that extra step to encourage competitive atWar play and reward players with 300% SP earned in Clan Wars. Please support.

No support, sorry keep it the same. Even though Id like to rank up, that's too much SP.

Support!

The idea of multipliers and bonuses that enable more experienced players to beat new players even more easily makes the game very unrewarding and frustrating for newer players.

There needs to be more motivation to encourage lower ranks to play this side of the game, and would be a great way for non premium members to gain more SP in skill games as opposed to the current allyfag 50k land.

And the idea would be for lower ranks to also play CW against each other

Hmmm yes 'yes this is an option

Wow so much greed.

Its not greed at all, its offering incentive to more players who want to play the game at a higher standard, which will only add value to the community as a whole, if clan wars are the quickest way to rank up, more people will train to play them, surely?

500% please

Wr1tt3n by opi, 02.11.2014 at 08:08

500% please

Trust Opi

Nah, too much. Players would go in for SP rather than enjoyment/the actual competition.

Wr1tt3n by Desu, 18.10.2014 at 22:29

Wr1tt3n by clovis1122, 18.10.2014 at 21:03

•) An announcements by own Admins/Mods that this tool will NOT BE USED in ANY KIND OF WAY for boost the favoritism in one specific map. They should clarify by now that this tool will not boost the SP earned in any kind of gameplay based only on europe+ or other "competitive" maps.

This is already guaranteed.

Sorry, this aint going to happen regardless of the poll.

No support! No CW-SP farming!

It is my strong belief that unfair SP gains should not be used to encourage a certain style of gameplay. Isn't that why the admins implemented map SP nerfs in the first place?
No support.

OK I get the point, 300% is too much, I would just like to see me more done by the admin to improve the structure and balance to see lower ranks play more competitive games, improving the standard of the community as a whole.

Wr1tt3n by International, 04.11.2014 at 00:38

It is my strong belief that unfair SP gains should not be used to encourage a certain style of gameplay. Isn't that why the admins implemented map SP nerfs in the first place?
No support.

this is no difrent style f game lay its bascilly all the same

Wr1tt3n by Htin, 04.11.2014 at 23:03

this is no difrent style f game lay its bascilly all the same

You distinguish between a normal game and a clan war. You do not call a clan war a normal game, and you don't call a normal game a clan war.
Therefore, they are different in some meaningful way.

Wr1tt3n by Sun Tsu, 04.11.2014 at 20:22

OK I get the point, 300% is too much, I would just like to see me more done by the admin to improve the structure and balance to see lower ranks play more competitive games, improving the standard of the community as a whole.

Dude its already 200% , idk why you have to be greedy

Wr1tt3n by Sun Tsu, 05.11.2014 at 08:05

Kingmaker, did you even read the forum? you quoted me agreeing with you yet say I am 'greedy', which is a blatant contradiction. At least read the post before calling be me greedy, then you will understand my point. And if you have anything of value to contribute please do.

I did read the forum, and you are being insanely greedy.

(300% sp)

Do you have any suggestion that actually matters and is not selfish? This topic should be locked, its sad high ranks only care about SP.

Well obviously you didn't read, because I agreed with the consensus that 300% is too much and that I would like to see more being done to motivate lower ranks into playing competitive games. I don't care about SP, I have the upgrades, lower ranks care about SP, and they can earn more spamming units in 50k games, then they can in competetive games. So when I needed upgrades I wasted my time doing that instead of learning the game up to rank 8.

Thats your fault for rushing your way to rank 10, while most people play for fun and they happen to rank up as they play.

The "low ranks play for sp" is a myth, low ranks only play whatever they find easy regardless of the SP. low ranks won't play competitive games unless we make them easy for them, like playing against people of similar skill.

Only high ranks (and their alts) play for SP, because they get obsessed to prove their "skills" with a virtual badge next to their name (when in reality 99% of high ranks are noobs that only know how to memorize).

Wr1tt3n by Sun Tsu, 05.11.2014 at 09:07

Well obviously you didn't read, because I agreed with the consensus that 300% is too much and that I would like to see more being done to motivate lower ranks into playing competitive games. I don't care about SP, I have the upgrades, lower ranks care about SP, and they can earn more spamming units in 50k games, then they can in competetive games. So when I needed upgrades I wasted my time doing that instead of learning the game up to rank 8.

1. The SP multiplier and soon the algoritm will limit the SP earned in those games.

2. Read: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=15895

As I said at the end, what we need is clans to stop being selfish and start sharing secrets.

Those stuff like " I wont teach you because you are not in my clan" or " Sorry you wont join my clan because you play RP" serious need to stop. I dont really see how people relationated a map with a player skills

I could has be stronger than I am now, but when I was rank 8 in a dead clan (ULP) nobody teaches me expancions and there was no advance 3vs3 guide on public forum. Even Desu's one is only the most basic. When I wanted to learn I found the "Join my clan and I teach you" selfishness

Clovis I agree 100%.... Kingmaker you miss my point completely, I am no arguing over sp farming. I am trying to add suggestions to make the community stronger as a whole. Do you have any?

Is it me or since RP got 0% or whatever amount of percentage, everybody is farming those ancient games now? ;p lel.