G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 4   V1s1t3d by: 55 users
25.08.2011 - 17:07
I think we should get attack infantry, because I don't think it's really fair that the only real ground attack unit that isn't stealth.

Also In real life, infantry is often used to attack, and I think attack infantry would be something people would really like.


The stats would be:

ARB:4

Cost: 90

Attack: 6

Defense: 4

Hit points: 7

Range: 6




This is only a suggestion though.
Capacity: 0 (of course)
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
25.08.2011 - 17:40
Wr1tt3n by Fidel_Castro, 25.08.2011 at 17:07
the only real ground attack unit that isn't stealth.

What about tanks?

And you can still use infantries to attack, you just need more of them , but their price compensates this. Also, if they weren't used for attacking PD would be a bad strategy, which it isn't.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
25.08.2011 - 17:43
Wr1tt3n by Pinheiro, 25.08.2011 at 17:40

Wr1tt3n by Fidel_Castro, 25.08.2011 at 17:07
the only real ground attack unit that isn't stealth.

What about tanks?


oops, i ment other then tanks
XO

I just dont think tanks should be the only ground attack unit.
Its not realistic, and i think there should be a cheaper way to get some ground attack
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
26.08.2011 - 02:51
Please discuss here. IMO though this sounds better suited as a new strategy (where infantry get + attack) rather than a whole new unit.

http://afterwind.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=68
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd