G3t Pr3m1um t0 h1d3 4ll 4ds
P0sts: 16   V1s1t3d by: 79 users
16.07.2015 - 08:26
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Well,we all know that HW is the weakest and most expensive strategy in this game.
Strategy boosts inf def,tank attack and marines cost is lower.
But nerfing inf attack,tank deff by -3(3v3 part)
submarine attack and deff by -2
bombers and stealth attack and deffence by -2,
annd at the end nerfing marines by -2 for attack and deff.
This strategy is weaker than GW that is plus on that boosting range of marines.
Only way that gw is weaker is deff of inf -2 and attack of tanks -2(i dont calculate attack of inf and deff of tanks cuz its -3 with HW)
If this is one more stealth strategy,we must fully revamp it.
All suggestians and your wieving of this strat post here.
I will add all suggestions at the poll that i will make when there will be enough suggestions about revamping this strategy.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 08:40
Support, better then just nerfing everything else but PD
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 08:50
I think everyone agrees HW warfare needs a boost. I really like the idea of it but the nerfs are too drastic. I think removing the sub attack and defense nerf as a whole, and removing the -1 attack to marines should prove best. To balance it though the -80 on marines could be just -60.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 09:07
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Wr1tt3n by The Tactician, 16.07.2015 at 08:50

I think everyone agrees HW warfare needs a boost. I really like the idea of it but the nerfs are too drastic. I think removing the sub attack and defense nerf as a whole, and removing the -1 attack to marines should prove best. To balance it though the -80 on marines could be just -60.

I told about gw that has same idea as hw,but marines of gw arent nerfed and same cost like hw....l
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 09:16
Hw is a mix between gw and the old gc, so its natural to be a little bit weaker than both to meet in the middle. I believe a strat with tanks and infantry stronger than normal but weaker than gc and marines/militia stronger than normal but weaker than gw would be a nice balance. I think my proposal will balance it out.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?


L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 09:26
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Wr1tt3n by The Tactician, 16.07.2015 at 09:16

Hw is a mix between gw and the old gc, so its natural to be a little bit weaker than both to meet in the middle. I believe a strat with tanks and infantry stronger than normal but weaker than gc and marines/militia stronger than normal but weaker than gw would be a nice balance. I think my proposal will balance it out.

ok
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 11:40
I am not seeing the proposal here
HW isn't bad its just hard to play strategy. We can try giving it cost boosts like -10 cost for tanks. Otherwise I think its fine as it is. I could also suggest +1 range for militia but that would make it one OP strat so I won't. I do wish people tried it a lot more though.
----
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 11:56
No lb is the weakest...
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
16.07.2015 - 13:36
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Wr1tt3n by Xenosapien, 16.07.2015 at 11:56

No lb is the weakest...

lb is stronger than no strategy,hw isnt.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.07.2015 - 08:56
I agree with minus, HW is just hard to play, not in-viable though. If you have room to expand, it is definitely doable. I guess if u want to change it give inf 2 attack so their not totally just defending and walk breaking.. But that's not that big of a deal. I honestly think it's fine as is
----


L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.07.2015 - 10:20
HW is not fine as it is. any strat has better units than HW.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
18.07.2015 - 18:07
HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.07.2015 - 06:59
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Wr1tt3n by Cthulhu, 18.07.2015 at 18:07

HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there

Agree,but can you tell me full thinking,about inf and tanks that are nerfed,and stealths attack and def.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.07.2015 - 07:06
Wr1tt3n by Kromn, 19.07.2015 at 06:59

Wr1tt3n by Cthulhu, 18.07.2015 at 18:07

HW should be a weaker version of GC and GW, but also cost cheaper. So, I would support a -10 on marine cost and see how it goes from there

Agree,but can you tell me full thinking,about inf and tanks that are nerfed,and stealths attack and def.


You can win 2 ways that i see it, by quality or by quantity. I believe HW should be more focused on quantity then quality. It doesn't need the best stealth, it just needs a lot
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.07.2015 - 07:29
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
This is my opinion:
Id like fully revamping it.
That can be mix between SM and GC.
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
19.07.2015 - 07:33
(deleted)
4cc0unt d3l3t3d
Wr1tt3n by Cthulhu, 19.07.2015 at 07:06



Well,marines attack 2 with hw.1 tank can kill 4 hw marines........
20 tanks can kill 80.....
Is it rly good to stay like this.......
L04d1ng...
L04d1ng...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Pr1v4cy | T3rms 0f s3rv1c3 | B4nn3rs | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

J01n us 0n

Spr34d th3 w0rd